关注微信领¥50

百门课程¥0元


50万+已关注

科学美国人60秒:人耳听声音-托福听力下载

2016-11-22 14:41:48来源:科学美国人60秒

点击查看>>科学美国人60秒音频:人耳听到的声音优于CD品质

  科学美国人60秒中英文翻译:人耳听到的声音优于CD品质

  科学美国人60秒英文文本

  This is Scientific American — 60-Second Science. I’m Christopher Intagliata.

  Jay Z's "Tidal" platform promises listeners CD-quality streaming music, in all its 44.1 kilohertz, 16 bit glory—much better, they say, than compressed files, like mp3s. But why stop there? Neil Young's PonoMusic Store sells music that's even better than CD quality.

  In a YouTube video for the service Young compares mp3 listeners to scuba divers, muddling around the seafloor. "You know you're walking around in the murk and there's big fish down there, that's kind of like listening to an mp3."

  CD listeners are underwater, too. The only way to rise to the top, he says, is to dial up sample rate to over four times that of CD: to 192 kilohertz. "When you make it to 192, you actually break through the surface, and you're breathing air. And the feeling is different, it actually is a visceral relief. You feel good."

  But… how good? What researchers, record producers, audiophiles, sound engineers, want to know is: "Is CD, compact disc, enough?" Joshua Reiss (RICE), who leads audio engineering research at Queen Mary University of London. "And the arguments seem to be never-ending."

  Reiss took a stab at settling the argument with a meta-analysis—a study of studies—on whether people can really perceive better-than-CD quality sound. He analyzed data from 18 studies, including more than 400 participants and nearly 13,000 listening tests. Overall, listeners picked out the better-than-CD-quality track 52.3 percent of the time. Statistically significant, if not all that impressive.

  But when Reiss isolated studies that trained listeners first and gave them a chance to feast their ears on the difference, their odds of picking the higher-quality track climbed to 60 percent. Suggesting there may actually be some perceptible difference... at least enough to convince Reiss to change his listening habits. "Yes I think I actually will, based on this." The analysis is in the Journal of the Audio Engineering Society.

  Not that it will settle all arguments. "No, no never. But what I think it might do is allow the researchers to move on a little bit from this question and to start looking deeper into the causes of the perception." And for the audiophiles out there? It's no doubt music to their ears.

  Thanks for listening Scientific American — 60-Second Science Science. I’m Christopher Intagliata.

  中文翻译请点击下一页

为你特别匹配的托福超值课程,快速提分先人一步!
  • 新东方托福公益课(第8期)

    新东方托福公益课(第8期)

    1元10节直播干货,新东方明星教师团,每日社群打卡带练

    课时:10小时

    查看详情
  •  托福口语训练营

    托福口语训练营

    9次托福口语满分大神 带你学透托福6大题型

    课时:3.5小时

    查看详情
  • 大学生旗舰直达班 (冲110分)

    【知心托福】大学生旗舰直达班 (冲110分)

    适合人群:托福目标分数110分!

    课时:343

    查看详情
  • 大学生旗舰直达班 (冲100分)

    【知心托福】大学生旗舰直达班 (冲110分)

    适合人群:托福目标分数100分!

    课时:331

    查看详情
  • 大学生旗舰直达班 (冲90分)

    【知心托福】大学生旗舰直达班 (冲90分)

    适合人群:托福目标分数90分!

    课时:310

    查看详情
全部课程>>
单项突破
直播课堂

更多托福课程
新东方25年教学经验沉淀
托福考生必修课
托福考生,高效提分,安心之选

查看详情>>
更多>>
更多课程>>
更多>>
更多内容
更多>>
更多公开课>>
更多>>
更多课程>>