科学美国人60秒:美国总统候选人受指责-托福听力下载

点击查看>>科学美国人60秒音频：美国总统候选人或因逃避问题受到指责

　　科学美国人60秒中英文翻译：美国总统候选人或因逃避问题受到指责

　　科学美国人60秒英文文本

　　This campaign season, there's been plenty of name calling and lots of accusations.

　　David Clementson, a PhD candidate at The Ohio State University, has been keeping tabs.

　　"I mean there was one debate where Rubio and Cruz were just all over Trump, accusing him of dodging questions."

　　"But that doesn't answer the question."

　　"He didn't answer…"

　　"You have yet to answer a single serious question about any of this."

　　Clementson wanted to see if claims of question dodging actually held up, historically—not necessarily in the unique case of Trump.

　　So Clementson analyzed the transcripts of 14 presidential debates, from 1996 to 2012.

　　Overall, he found 51 accusations of question dodging—26 by Dems, 25 by Republicans.

　　A third of the time, the accused candidate did in fact go off-topic.

　　But in every single case, the accused candidate still mentioned the question topic.

　　Meaning that most of the time, he says, candidates are unfairly accused of question-dodging.

　　The results are in the Journal of Language and Social Psychology.

　　Clementson's advice for the next debate?

　　"Just because a politician of your partisan affiliation or your party ID is telling you that the other guy can't be believed, doesn't necessarily mean that that politician is accurately detecting deception."

　　In other words, don't trust'em.

　　Because the politician doing the accusing may be the one telling lies.

　　"Lying Ted…he's a liar."

　　中文翻译请点 击下一页