课程咨询

托福考试网 托福资料下载 托福资讯 0元讲座 水平测试

托福考试练习
新东方在线 > TOEFL > 托福写作 > 正文
托福培训

扫码免费领资料

内含托福全科备考资料

更有免费水平测试及备考规划

托福培训

扫码关注掌握一手留学资讯

回复XDF免费水平测试

录播精讲 直播课HOT

托福写作语料库：与Google争夺被遗忘权

2018-04-16 14:23:47来源：网络

　　为了帮助大家高效备考托福，新东方在线托福频道为大家带来托福写作语料库：与Google争夺被遗忘权，希望对大家托福备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线托福频道!

　　Google loses 'right to be forgotten' case

　　A businessman fighting for the "right to be forgotten"(被遗忘权) has won a UK High Court action against Google.

　　The man, who has not been named due to reporting restrictions surrounding the case, wanted search results(搜索结果) about a past crime(犯罪前科) he had committed removed from the search engine(搜索引擎).

　　The judge, Mr Justice Mark Warby, ruled in his favour(支持) on Friday.

　　But he rejected a separate claim(诉求) made by another businessman who had committed a more serious crime.

　　The businessman who won his case was convicted(被判处) 10 years ago of conspiring(密谋) to intercept communications(截取通讯). He spent six months in jail(坐了6个月的牢).

　　The other businessman, who lost his case, was convicted more than 10 years ago of conspiring to account falsely(做假账). He spent four years in jail.

　　Both had ordered Google to remove search results about their convictions, including links to news articles, stating that they were no longer relevant.

　　They took Google to court when it refused to remove the search results.

　　Google said it would accept the rulings(判决).

　　"We work hard to comply with(遵守) the right to be forgotten, but we take great care(小心翼翼) not to remove search results that are in the public interest(符合公众利益的)," it said in a statement.

　　"We are pleased that the Court recognised our efforts in this area, and we will respect the judgements they have made in this case."

　　'Legal precedent'(先例)

　　The right to be forgotten is a legal precedent set by the Court of Justice of the European Union in 2014, following a case brought by Spaniard Mario Costeja Gonzalez who had asked Google to remove information about his financial history.

　　Google says it has removed 800,000 pages from its results following so-called "right to be forgotten" requests. However, search engines can decline(拒绝) to remove pages if they judge them to remain in the public interest.

　　Explaining the decisions made on Friday, the judge said one of the men had continued to "mislead the public"(误导公众) while the other had "shown remorse"(悔改).

　　The Open Rights Group, which campaigns for(争取) internet freedoms, said the rulings set a "legal precedent".

　　"The right to be forgotten is meant to apply to information that is no longer relevant but disproportionately(显著地/严重地) impacts(影响) a person," said Jim Killock, executive director.

　　"The Court will have to balance the public's right to access(获取) the historical record, the precise impacts on the person, and the public interest(公众的利益)."

本文关键字: 托福写作语料库 托福写作

托福辅导

关注新东方在线托福

托福机经·Official题目练习

考前重点突破·听说读写海量资料

更多资料

关注新东方在线托福，
回复【XDF】获取大礼包

托福辅导
  • 1.打开手机微信【扫一扫】，识别上方二维码；
  • 2.点击【添加】，回复对应关键字领取学习资料。
更多>>
更多内容

免费获取托福备考大礼包

微信扫描下方二维码 立即领取

托福辅导
更多>>
更多公益讲座>>
更多>>
更多资料
托福TPO 托福听力练习 托福口语练习 托福阅读练习 托福写作练习
我要
反馈 返回
首页
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10