课程咨询
托福培训

扫码免费领资料

内含托福全科备考资料

更有免费水平测试及备考规划

托福培训

扫码关注掌握一手留学资讯

回复XDF免费水平测试

托福写作新题型试题+范文:应该对破坏环境的公司提高税收吗

2023-09-14 10:07:00来源:新东方

新东方在线托福整理了2023托福写作改革评分标准、考试时间、写作试题以及写作范文等内容,今天带来的是托福写作新题型试题+范文:应该对破坏环境的公司提高税收或加大处罚吗,希望大家的托福写作有所帮助!

托福写作新题型试题

Your professor is teaching a class on sociology. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

In your response, you should

· express and support your personal opinion

· make a contribution to the discussion in your own words

An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You have ten minutes to write.

Doctor Achebe:

Many companies provide important products and services but at the same time cause environment damages. Some people believe the way to prevent these companies from damaging the environment is for the government to require more penalties from them, such as higher tax and larger fine. Do you think it is a good idea?

Andrew:

A lot of companies make helpful products but hurt the environment too. I think the government should punish them more, like raising their taxes and fines, to stop the damage. Doing that would hold corporations accountable and force them to change in an impactful way. We can have both innovation and sustainability if governments incentivize it properly through penalties.

Claire:

I disagree that we should penalize corporations more for environmental damage. Many companies are already taking steps to adopt greener practices, and higher taxes or fines could discourage innovation and hurt the economy. Instead of punishing businesses, I believe the government should reward and incentivize sustainable choices through subsidies and tax breaks.

托福写作新题型范文

While imposing more penalties, as Andrew says, is effective in dissuading companies to cause further damage to the environment, by contrast, Claire also holds merit in the topic presented by the professor. Obviously, adopting the policy can contribute to environment protection. To be specific, not only can it serve as a deterrent but also, to some extent, encourage companies to adopt more sustainable practices, leading to conservation of natural resources, ecosystems, and biodiversity. However, the welcome effects will soon vanish, when companies spare no effort to evade the fear-based mechanism embedded in this strategy and successfully compensate for their monetary loss. In reality, it is coherently reasonable to believe that rejecting exorbitantly high taxes and penalties while contriving other moderate ways, such as raising citizen’s environmental awareness, would also be constructive to mitigating the negative impacts exerted on the environment from these companies in the long run. Of course, we cannot deny that being firmly resistant is not airtight, especially when the whole society hovers on the brink of collapse in the face of the environmental calamity. In conclusion, considering all the facts laid out above, we should be resilient in taking either side of the argument.

更多托福备考资料、托福机经,同学们可以扫描下方二维码,关注新东方在线托福,回复【XDF】,即可获得托福资料包!

你是否还想知道:

正式官宣!托福考试重大改革:写作加入新题型,加试将成历史!

托福改革:托福新题型ETS官方范文及写作思路汇总

2023年托福考试时间一览表

托福辅导

关注新东方在线托福

托福机经·Official题目练习

考前重点突破·听说读写海量资料

更多资料
更多>>
更多内容

免费获取托福备考大礼包

微信扫描下方二维码 立即领取

托福辅导
更多>>
更多公益讲座>>
更多>>
更多资料