课程咨询
托福培训

扫码免费领资料

内含托福全科备考资料

更有免费水平测试及备考规划

托福培训

扫码关注掌握一手留学资讯

回复XDF免费水平测试

托福写作tpo范文:TPO35综合写作+独立写作范文汇总

2023-10-11 10:53:00来源:网络

新东方在线托福整理了托福TPO介绍、托福TPO刷题网站、托福TPO试题及答案等内容,今天带来的是托福TPO35综合写作+独立写作范文汇总,希望对大家的托福考试有所帮助!

托福TPO35综合写作范文

The reading passage introduces the Voynich manuscript and lists three theories to guess at its author. However, the lecturer rebuts each of these three theories one by one.

First, the passage assumes that the manuscript was written by Anthony Aschain, who used some sophisticated secret code to convey significant scientific or magical materials. Nevertheless, the speaker believes that Ascham himself was just a common scientist with no special talent. For example, The Little Herbal, the book written by him, only contains some knowledge about common plants taken from other well—known sources. It is unlikely that he was capable of turning out such an elaborately coded, secret document.

Second, the writer suggests that the manuscript might be a fake one containing totally useless contents, written by Edward Kelley, a sixteer.th—century personality who pretended to have magical powers for cheating money out of European nobles. The listening material also admits that Kelley had a bad fame of tricking people, but it immediately states that citizens living in

Kelley’ s century were too easy to deceive so there was no need to make up such a complicated manuscript in order to fool them.

According to the lecture, if Kelley intended to cheat citizens then, he just had to create a much simpler book.

The last theory proposed by the author is that the manuscript is a modern fake produced by Voynich himself. The speaker opposes this idea because the pages and inks used to make this script can date back to at least four hundred years. Even though voynich could get ancient pages from old books to make this fake one, it is still impossible for him to find 400—year—old ink. (279 words)

托福TPO35独立写作范文

Gossip news about entertainers and athletes’ private life flood the media, prir.t or online, every day. These people’ s family, children, friends and even pets have hit the headlines so often that some would wonder whether they deserve to have more privacy than they have now. From my perspective, an affirmative answer to this question would benefit both society, these famous people and their fans.

Less media exposure for the celebrities’ private life would make a conducive impact on the whole society, especially young people. Most of the gossip news is about the stars’ scandals, rather than their positive behaviors. In the media coverage, a famous singer could meanwhile be a drug abuser and a glorious athlete might also commit domestic violence. The terrible thing is their fans are often young kids who have not established their own moral values yet to distinguish right and wrong, so they are unable to tell which of their idol’ s behavior is worth imitating. All those conducts of their idols will be admired and imitated indiscriminately. They may take drugs or abuse their family members physically, thinking, “‘why can’ t I do as my idol did?” In this case, less reports on the so—called private life can eliminate those negative effects.

Decreasing these public figures’ exposure would also help protect them as well as their fans. When a personality is followed by the endless stream of tabloid photographers, his or her personal safety could be seriously threatened. For example, British‘s Princess Diana died in a car accident when her driver drove through a tunnel at a high speed in order to avoid the paparazzi.

Before this tragedy, she had pleaded with the media for many times to leave her some private space, but the media just ignored her request for attracting more audience or clicks. Although she was not an actress or athlete, who can tell for sure that no entertainer would end up like her? Fans would suffer as well. Once the media leak a top singer’ s whereabouts, crazy fans rush into the airport or railway station in the name of picking up their idol. This is how many stampedes have taken place. Only when such private information does not go public may the safety of both the stars and their fans be guaranteed.

Privacy is a common right of citizens and celebrities and people around them shall enjoy it as well. Although famous entertainers and athletes appear in IV shows and front pages, they also deserve their own time after work. When the phone number, family address and even children’s school are exposed, they and their family, children in particular, would receive undue disturbances. Sun Cruise, the daughter of the best—known American actor Tom Cruise, used to be one of the most photographed children in the world. She could not enjoy her right to grow up like a normal kid until her parents’ divorce, which kept her away from the media spotlight. There are still many pictures she and her mother do not want to be posted on websites. This unwanted attention is unfair for her since she is not a public figure.

Entertainers and athlete deserve more privacy than now. Not only does society benefit from a conducive social environment resulting from less media reports, but also the celebrities and people around them meet their need for personal safety and a private life. (592 words)

更多托福TPO模考练习,同学们可以点击下方链接进行模考和刷题!

https://liuxue.koolearn.com/toefl/

同学们也可以下载新东方托福Pro APP,TPO30-58免费刷~

托福Pro app 下载链接:https://datayi.cn/WXlqKaaidNXRG

托福Pro app下载二维码

APP和网站做题数据互通哦~

更多托福备考资料、托福机经,同学们可以扫描下方二维码,关注新东方在线托福,回复【XDF】,即可获得托福资料包!

你是否还想知道:

托福在线模拟考试TPO(附TPO练习和下载链接)

新东方托福入学测试

2023年托福考试时间表(全年安排)

托福辅导

关注新东方在线托福

托福机经·Official题目练习

考前重点突破·听说读写海量资料

更多资料
更多>>
更多内容

免费获取托福备考大礼包

微信扫描下方二维码 立即领取

托福辅导
更多>>
更多公益讲座>>
更多>>
更多资料