课程咨询
托福培训

扫码免费领资料

托福全科备考资料

免费水平测试及规划

托福培训

扫码关注掌握一手留学资讯

回复XDF免费水平测试

托福写作新题型范文[附试题]:政府资金用于艺术项目还是

2023-11-11 19:15:00来源:新东方 雷碧珊

新东方在线托福整理了2023托福写作改革评分标准、考试时间、写作试题以及写作范文等内容,今天带来的是托福写作新题型范文[附试题]:政府资金用于艺术项目还是娱乐活动,希望大家的托福写作有所帮助!

托福写作新题型试题

Your professor is teaching a class on sociology. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

In your response, you should

· express and support your personal opinion

· make a contribution to the discussion in your own words

An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You have ten minutes to write.

Doctor Achebe:Local governments have limited budgets to spend on enriching residents' lives. Supporting arts programs like concerts and museums offers cultural engagement, while funding recreational activities like hiking trails and parks promotes healthy lifestyles. As students who appreciate culture and wellness, let's discuss whether local funding should support arts programs or recreational activities more. Which do you think better serves the community and why?

Kelly: I think local governments should prioritize spending on outdoor trails and parks rather than arts programs like museums and concerts. More people would use and benefit from improved recreation spaces than arts venues. If fewer residents are interested in the arts, they won't attend museums or concerts even if government funds them.

Andrew: I believe local governments should actually prioritize spending on arts programs like museums and concerts rather than recreation. Precisely because fewer residents are inherently interested in the arts, public funding is essential to sustain these cultural institutions for the minority who appreciate them. Without support, access to the arts will decline and society will lose these enriching, enduring outlets for creative expression.

托福写作新题型范文

I’m on board with Kelly’s idea that governments should consider funding recreational facilities since residents prefer to participate in outdoor activities rather than appreciate art in a museum or a gallery. Besides that, I hold the notion that governments that give priority to invest in recreational facilities can effectively promote the overall well-being of the community. Obviously, the main reason is that when city dwellers are provided access to recreational spaces, they will have the precious chance to engage in a range of outdoor physical activities, which means that the risk of various health issues caused by sedentary habits can be reduced. For instance, my grandparents had an unforgettable experience of having accessible recreational facilities funded by the local government; to be more specific, they engaged in a variety of activities, including jogging and playing badminton, in a newly constructed park every morning, contributing to the fact that they were rarely bothered by chronic diseases, like arthritis. By contrast, if governments spend a modest outlay on recreational facilities, the overall fitness of residents will not be enhanced significantly, owing to the fact that people have limited opportunities to take part in outdoor activities, so they are more prone to a sedentary lifestyle, which can increase the risk of health problems such as obesity and diabetes. Therefore, I think that governments should prioritize funding recreational activities since it can have a positive effect on residents’ life expectancy.

托福辅导

关注新东方在线托福

托福机经·Official题目练习

考前重点突破·听说读写海量资料

更多资料
更多>>
更多内容

免费获取托福备考大礼包

微信扫描下方二维码 立即领取

托福辅导
更多>>
更多公益讲座>>
更多>>
更多资料